Testseek.com have collected 150 expert reviews of the AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT 3.9GHz Socket AM4 and the average rating is 83%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD Ryzen 7 3800XT 3.9GHz Socket AM4.
July 2020
(83%)
150 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
The Ryzen 7 3800XT offers huge improvements on multithreaded workload over the Ryzen 5 3600XT, offering up to 32% more performance in rendering tasks. That being said, users will not gain significantly more frames on games as most of our results show only...
Visoke ukupne performanse, poboljšane single core performanse, odličan overclocking potencijal, dolazi po cijeni modela kojeg zamjenjuje
Još nije ulovio gaming performanse Intela
Izbacivanjem nova tri brža procesora AMD pokazuje koliko im je 7-nanometarski proces napredovao i koliko su u stanju podići single i light-threaded performanse. Novi je procesor brz na svim poljima, a odličan je i overclocker. Sve to po istoj cijeni od 39...
Abstract: Jajaran prosesor AMD Ryzen XT series memberikan hasil positif bagi penggemar, dan AMD kini membawanya dengan sesuatu yang jauh lebih seru dengan paket bundle game terbaru Assassin's Creed Valhalla yang akan dirilis desember tahun ini.Hanya saja perlu dica...
Abstract: AMD's Ryzen 3000 XT series can be interpreted as AMD's response against Intel's 10th generation desktop processors. The company's initial reaction towards Intel 10th Gen processors is discounting the Ryzen 9 3900X and Ryzen 7 3800X in the US via Amazon an...
Impressive overall performance, Easier to overclock than the existing Ryzen 3000 series, Supports PCIe 4.0 on both B550 and X570 motherboards, Bundled with Assassin's Creed: Valhalla,
Higher price, CPU cooler not included, Definitely still not as fast as Intel when it comes to gaming
As much as we look forward to giving the other Ryzen 3000XT a try, the existence of the series itself is somewhat questionable at this point in time. It is definitely a faster and better version or perhaps, revision of the existing Ryzen 3000 but only for...
