cn.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD A10-6700 3.7GHz Socket FM2



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD A10-6700 3.7GHz Socket FM2

Testseek.com have collected 102 expert reviews of the AMD A10-6700 3.7GHz Socket FM2 and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD A10-6700 3.7GHz Socket FM2.
Award: Most Awarded July 2013
July 2013
 
(79%)
102 Reviews
Users
(87%)
28 Reviews
79 0 100 102

 

Reviews

page 3 of 11
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2013-06-05, review by: legitreviews.com

  • Abstract:  Last week, Intel released 4th Generation Core “Haswell” processors and this week we have AMD releasing the company’s 3rd generation of APUs, known as “Richland.” AMD “Richland” APUs are said to bring 20-40 percent performance increases over the previous generation of AMD A-Series “Trinity” APUs, so AMD fans have been waiting months for this day to come. The other nice thing about these new APUs is that they don’t require a new platform and work in all existing AMD Socket FM2 motherboards after a quick BIOS update. Read more at http://www.legitreviews.com/amd-a10-6800k-and-a10-6700-richland-apu-reviews_2209#xYMFJAfBssbuD3pd.99....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2013-06-05, review by: techwarelabs.com

  • Abstract:  With the release of the Llano chips in mid-2011 and the Trinity chips in late-2012, the AMD APUs were shown to be the perfect option for the person who wanted a cheap, yet capable system that could be expanded on in the future. They not only offered p...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-06-04, Author: Victor , review by: Bjorn3d.com

  • The A10-6800K delivers somewhere from 5% to 25% performance improvements over the A10-5800K where a workload is CPU bound, then the improvement often lies on the lower end of the spectrum. On the average, the APU is about 10% faster than its predecessor....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-06-04, Author: Don , review by: tomshardware.com

  • Abstract:  Richland, code name for AMD's highest-end APUs, finds its way into our lab in the form of A10-6700 and A10-6800K. Based on the Piledriver architecture and VLIW4 graphics, these chips are slight improvements to Trinity. Can they outshine Core i3, though? ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-06-04, review by: benchmarkreviews.com

  • Beats comparatively priced Intel CPUs, No Need to get a New Motherboard, 35W lower TDP than the A106800K,
  • Performance over Trinity doesn't justify pricing
  • So the question is whether or not the 35W lower TDP on the A10-6700 makes up for 200MHz slower clock speed. The benchmark results are very clear. The A10-6700 performs exactly the same as the A10-6800K when it comes to graphics performance. That makes...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(85%)
 
  Published: 2013-08-05, Author: Sindre , review by: tek.no

  • Abstract:  AMD lanserte tidligere i sommer sine nye APU-modeller med "Richland"-arkitektur . Produsentens APU-serie er en integrert løsning med både systemprosessor og grafikkprosessor i samme enhet. Både prosessor- og grafikkytelse må betegnes som relativt beskjede...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-12-25, review by: Tweak.dk

  • Abstract:  Som nævnt i sidste uge, ville der på Tweak.dk komme et par sammenligninger af to produkter mellem to konkurrenter. Sidst tog vi et kig på AMD vs NVIDIA-grafikkort. Denne gang er vi gået et lille skridt tilbage rent grafikmæssigt. Nu skal vi nemlig teste p...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2015-02-24, Author: Eric , review by: comptoir-hardware.com

  • Abstract:  En juin 2006, Intel abandonnait sa tant décriée microarchitecture Netburst pour lancer Core, renonçant dès lors à la course à la fréquence au profit de l'efficacité pour un résultat que l'on connait : jamais le fondeur n'a depuis cédé le trône des perform...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2014-06-12, Author: Eric , review by: comptoir-hardware.com

  • Abstract:  En juin 2006, Intel abandonnait sa tant décriée microarchitecture Netburst pour lancer Core, renonçant dès lors à la course à la fréquence au profit de l'efficacité pour un résultat que l'on connait : jamais le fondeur n'a depuis cédé le trône des perform...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2013-09-02, review by: ginjfo.com

  • Abstract:  Face à Intel, AMD capitalise sur ses solutions APU avec le lancement récent de Richland. Cette génération propose de jouer le rôle de passage de témoin avant l’arrivée de Kaveri qui malheureusement accuse du retard.L’APU chez AMD est une puce où plusie...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(80%)
    page 3 of 11 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 11   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×