cn.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Apple iPod Nano 6G 8GB / 16GB MC525/MC526



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Apple iPod Nano 6G 8GB / 16GB MC525/MC526

Testseek.com have collected 120 expert reviews of the Apple iPod Nano 6G 8GB / 16GB MC525/MC526 and the average rating is 73%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Apple iPod Nano 6G 8GB / 16GB MC525/MC526.
 
(73%)
120 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
73 0 100 120

 

Reviews

page 6 of 12
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2010-10-26, review by: cyberbloc.de

  • Abstract:  Bei Frauen geht er wohl als „süß“ durch, männliche Kumpanen sind von der Miniaturisierung des neuen iPod nano eher beeindruckt, als das sie ihn als niedlich bezeichnen. In minimalistische 4,1 mal 3,8 Zentimeter verpackt Apple in der neuesten, sechsten ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-09-13, review by: pcgameshardware.de

  • Abstract:  Der Ipod hat von den Apple-MP3-Playern im Laufe der Zeit mit die meisten Änderungen in Sachen Design und Funktionsumfang mitgemacht. Die erste und zweite Generation des Players war eher länglich gehalten und mit einem kleinen Bildschirm versehen. Die d...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-09-10, review by: computerbild.de

  • Die sechste Generation des iPod nanos hat mit seinem Vorgänger außer dem Namen wenig gemein: Er ist viel kleiner, zeigt keine Videos und hat weder Lautsprecher noch Mikrofon. Lob verdienen die einfache Touchscreen- Bedienung und der gute Klang.Dieses Prod...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2010-09-09, review by: Cnet.de

  • MultitouchDisplay, nur noch etwa halb so groß wie der Vorgänger, integrierter BefestigungsClip,
  • keine VideoAufnahme und Wiedergabe mehr, weder Spiele noch Wecker und Kalender, weder Lautsprecher noch Mikrofon, TouchscreenInterface ist cool, aber nicht unbedingt besser,
  • Die sechste Generation des iPod Nano ist die bislang kleinste. Erstmals gibt es ein Multitouch-Display, und erstmals muss sogar der iPod Shuffle vor Konkurrenz zittern: Mit einem Gewicht von gerade einmal 21 Gramm und Gürtelclip ist er ähnlich mobil. ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2011-10-24, review by: goodgearguide.com.au

  • New watch faces are nice, Built-in fitness features work well, It's still a great portable music player
  • Upgrades from last model are minor at best
  • Apple has made a (very) minor upgrade to the iPod nano with the addition of some new watch faces in the Clock app, and extra features for the Nike+ fitness app. A cynic would say the new model doesn't offer any advantages for existing iPod owners, but the...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2010-12-20, review by: pcauthority.com.au

  • A touch of luxury in a highly desirable package, but not without its problems. See whether Apple's latest iPod Nano is worth purchasing ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(83%)
 
  Published: 2010-10-01, review by: goodgearguide.com.au

  • Responsive and clear multitouch screen, compact, FM radio, ease of use
  • No camera, no video recorder, lacks alarm clock and calendar, can't manually turn it off, no in-line headphone controls
  • Apple has completely overhauled the iPod Nano. The sixth-generation portable media player is even smaller than its predecessors and features a handy touchscreen, but it lacks some key features of previous models...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2010-09-24, review by: macworld.com.au

  • Tiny; touch-screen; easy to use; tiny; has a dock connector
  • Clip is awkward; no video; no apps, $199 (8GB); $229 (16GB)
  • If you run, ride, walk, jog, or a vast range of other exercises, and like to listen to music at the same time, the iPod nano is for you. It’s beyond portable, and you can have it everywhere you go. If you can’t afford the nano, but want the same portab...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2010-09-10, review by: gadgetguy.com.au

  • Great size; Very light; Superb design; Easy to use; Volume increments have been refined to give you more control
  • Accessibility functions need more work; Battery may run out faster than expected

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2010-09-10, review by: gadgetguy.com.au

  • Great size; Very light; Superb design; Easy to use; Volume increments have been refined to give you more control
  • Accessibility functions need more work; Battery may run out faster than expected

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
    page 6 of 12 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 12   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×