Testseek.com have collected 96 expert reviews of the Apple iPod Nano 7G 8GB / 16GB MD480/MKN52 and the average rating is 77%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Apple iPod Nano 7G 8GB / 16GB MD480/MKN52.
September 2015
(77%)
96 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Intuitive and lovely to use, sleek and attractive design, clear and colourful picture, sound quality is a step above previous generation
Small screen isn't ideal for watching videos, finger-marks on screen
Once again, Apple does play up to the niche market – like the iPod Touch, the Nano does have very specific functions for specific uses. While there aren't many high-end portable music players on the market, the 7th generation Nano is a clear step ahead of...
Abstract: The latest version of the Apple iPod Nano MP3 player is a bit bigger than last year's matchbook-sized 6th generation model, it's still very light at 31g and is small enough to slide unobtrusively into a shirt pocket. The rigid and robust aluminium body...
Very thin and light, 2.5in screen, improved headphones,
New charge/sync port won't fit existing iPod docks
The new nano has a bigger screen than its predecessor making it a much better bet for video watching. It makes sorting and playing your music easy when you're on the move, and it sounds even better thanks to the new EarPod earphones. The new power/sync...
Good capacity, great design, sounds ace, FM radio is brilliant, Nike+ sync, lovely screen
Will scratch, fairly expensive
If we were really feeling picky, we could say that the nano is a bit too expensive. And, we suppose, compared to other products, it might be a bit more pricey. But you get the Nike+ facilities built-in, there's the radio and brilliant video playback an...
Slim body, Responsive touchscreen, Easy to use interface
A bit expensive, Fairly low screen res, Limited features
The 2012 iPod nano 7th generation doesn't have the chops to make the same impact as a new iPod touch or iPhone 5. Its screen isn't great in some respects, it's a bit expensive and it doesn't do all that much. However, it's so much of a joy to use on a day...
Apple can never seem to make its mind up when it comes to the iPad nano. First it was long, then it was fat, then it was long again, then square, and now once again, it’s long. It was a smart choice though: the 5.4mm thin aluminium frame is as sturdy as it is beautiful.It’s an iPod nano, it’s an Apple device: you don’t need us to tell you by this point that it’s easy to use. Still, we’re happy to
Yes, the new iPod nano certainly is pretty. But it’s an iPod nano that plays video and connects to iTunes to sync all your media. In other words, it’s the same as it was in 2007. Minus the clickwheel. It’d be tempting to pass it off as “don’t fix what ain’t broke”, but this is Apple, and we’re not giving it a pass. Why not fix it? Wi-Fi for one, wouldn’t go amiss, for iTunes streaming or even - g
There’s no doubt that this iPod nano is the best one Apple’s created - and its existence next to the iPod shuffle is once again justified. But now that it resembles the iPhone more than ever, it raises the question: why doesn’t it do more? For work out...
Like millions of other people I now use my smartphone as my primary portable media player, and this redesign isn’t going to reverse that trend. Even so, this is still a pretty smart update, and the Bluetooth capability and slimline design of the new N...
Very thin and light, yet sturdy, Large, nicely responsive touchscreen, Excellent battery life, Supports wireless Bluetooth streaming
Still no video recording, No inline playback controls
At £129, the iPod Nano is still £40 less expensive than the £169 base model iPod Touch, which is also a year old; the new iPod Touch Apple introduced with this iPod Nano now starts at £249 for 32GB. This pricing scheme makes the iPod Nano an ideal choic...
Plays video in widescreen; small; colours will appeal to some
No clip for sportswear attachment; last year's iPod touch is available for £20 more
To be honest, we're simply glad to see the nano get back on track after the somewhat baffling experiment with the 2010 model. It's still a bit pricey, and we reckon Apple really needs a model that hits the £99.99 mark, but the larger screen and super-slim...
