Testseek.com have collected 76 expert reviews of the TP-Link Archer C7 AC1750 Dual Band Wireless AC Gigabit Router and the average rating is 79%. Scroll down and see all reviews for TP-Link Archer C7 AC1750 Dual Band Wireless AC Gigabit Router.
November 2014
(79%)
76 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Abstract: Here is the review of the TP-Link C7 AC1750 Wireless Dual Band Gigabit Router (as seen on the Gadget Show September 2014). Picture below is the front of the box in vibrant green colour with the model number, this router was tested for cable internet.Speci...
Overall, the best routers are the ASUS RT-AC68U, Apple AirPort Extreme, D-Link DIR-868L, and the Netgear R7000 Nighthawk, with Apple's offering being the fastest in almost every test. You cannot ignore this router when strictly focusing on performance, ...
If you're looking for an 802.11AC router but aren't terribly concerned with blazing speed, the Archer C7 is not a bad choice, thanks to a reasonable price and very good wireless range....
Was this review helpful?
(60%)
Published: 2013-12-05, Author: Neil , review by: techradar.com
Good overall performance, Decent price, Great feature set
Slight blip in AC speed
The average 802.11ac upstream performance we feel is more of a blip for the TP-Link Archer C7, as it's still more than usable and is providing good to excellent downstream speeds, which are really more important. The real win is that you get a top-class ...
The Archer C7 from TP-Link made a good impression. It comes with more than enough features and generally performs fine. It's also priced fairly affordably, at an average of £120/ € 125. It's as low compared to the competition as in the past, however. Ri...
En definitiva, hemos tenido la oportunidad de probar un router que, aunque poco discreto y preocupado por lo visual, resulta especialmente útil en lo práctico gracias a su apartado técnico. La mejora de la red WiFi tras su instalación es realmente notable...
rendimiento muy bueno en distancias cortas y medias, bastante bueno en las largas, precio muy ajustado para ser un router ac, doble banda 2.4/5ghz, soporte para ddwrt, rendimiento muy bueno en distancias cortas y medias, bastante bueno en las largas, pre
…aunque desgraciadamente solo en la revisiÓn v2, muy improbable incluso en el futuro el soporte para la v1, rendimiento usb2.0 discreto, el procesador se hace notar aqui, aunque desgraciadamente solo en la revisiÓn v2, muy improbable incluso en el
Rendimiento sobresaliente LANLAN excepto en la prueba de 1000 hilos que no termina, Notable rendimiento en la prueba USB tanto en lectura como escritura así como el rendimiento del DLNA en NTFS. Sin embargo, conseguimos menos velocidad que con el modelo T
Rendimiento deficiente en la prueba LANWAN (porque hemos tenido que desactivar el NAT por hardware), El NAT por hardware nos impide terminar la prueba de rendimiento correctamente, hemos tenido que desactivarlo para las pruebas. TPLINK debe sacar una actu
Este análisis era esperado por muchos usuarios de TP-LINK que no sabían si adquirir el TP-LINK TL-WDR4900 o dar el paso directamente a la tecnología 802.11ac. A día de hoy, lo que podemos recomendar desde RedesZone es que esperemos a ver si TP-LINK...
Abstract: 전에 쓰던 제품이 기가랜을 지원하지 않아서 한번 사보았습니다.박싱은 2년전이나 똑같더군요 ㅎ공유기본체와 안테나 세개 랜케이블 한개 입니다. (CD가 있지만 본체 와 같이있더군요)전원케이블이.. 정리가 안되있더군요.. 비닐속에 있어서 괜찬다는건지.. 아니면.. 원래그런건지.. 이건참 보기 안좋더군요드디어 공유기 본체 입니다. 뭔가.. 아름답군요후면 포트에는 안테나 포트3개와USB포트2개리셋전원버튼랜단자 등이 존재합니다.안테나를 장착한 모습입니다...
Abstract: '가정에서 좀 더 빠른 속도로 와이파이를 이용하고 싶다'이런 생각을 갖고 그 방법을 찾는 이들이 적지 않을 겁니다. 이에 실제로 많은 사람들이 '공유기' 자체에 대한 관심만으로 제품을 고르기도 하는 것으로 알고 있는데요. 그런데 그전에 그 성능을 제대로 뽑아낼 수 있는 환경(메인보드 랜카드 공유기 케이블 등)을 먼저 구축해야 한다는 사실 알고 계신가요? 누군가는 기본 중에 기본인걸 굳이 설명해야 하냐고 말할지도 모르나 의외로 이런 부분을 놓치고 있...
