cn.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » AMD FX-8320E 3.2GHz Socket AM3 Plus



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of AMD FX-8320E 3.2GHz Socket AM3 Plus

Testseek.com have collected 64 expert reviews of the AMD FX-8320E 3.2GHz Socket AM3 Plus and the average rating is 82%. Scroll down and see all reviews for AMD FX-8320E 3.2GHz Socket AM3 Plus.
Award: Most Awarded March 2015
March 2015
 
(82%)
64 Reviews
Users
(94%)
44 Reviews
82 0 100 64

 

Reviews

page 4 of 7
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2014-12-15, review by: tomshw.de

  • Abstract:  Einer geht noch... The last man standing bei AMD? Mit dem FX-8320E rundet man das Portfolio nach gefühlten 100 Launches erneut nach unten ab, lässt jedoch auch den Multiplikator wieder sperrangelweit offen. Gut: Bei 3,2 GHz sollte jetzt auch endlich mal S...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2018-05-05, Author: Phil , review by: pctechreviews.com.au

  • I wouldn't be buying this CPU to run at stock speeds. This is a CPU that is sensibly priced and gives bang for buck, especially if you're happy to slap an above average cooler on it and overclock it to around the 4.5GHz mark. As with all overclocking, you...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2015-02-27, Author: Dave , review by: techradar.com/au/

  • A decent upgrade for an existing AMD setup, relatively cheap
  • Old, old tech, still more powerhungry than Intel, no native USB 3.0 or PCIe support
  • The cheapest eight-threaded CPU around, but there are better options if you don't need that sort of multi-threaded capability....

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2015-09-03, Author: BluePanda , review by: overclockersclub.com

  • Lower TDP = lower heat, Good single threaded performance (given the TDP), Good overclocking results!, Good gaming performance, Cheap!
  • Multicore performance suffers due to lower TDP
  • How to summarize the FX-8320E and MSI 970 Gaming? In short, they're a perfect pair. For a price lower than any of the Intel CPUs alone, you can get both a very good CPU for general use and gaming, as well as a damn fine motherboard to go with it... along...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2015-07-14, review by: uk.hardware.info

  • Abstract:  That the fastest processors are currently made by Intel is not really a secret, but what is the best choice when you want to spend up to £ 50, £100 or £150? To answer that question we conducted a megatest of 57 current AMD and Intel CPUs. From two to...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-02-28, Author: Dave , review by: techradar.com

  • A decent upgrade for an existing AMD setup, relatively cheap
  • Old, old tech, still more power, hungry than Intel, no native USB 3.0 or PCIe support
  • The cheapest eight-threaded CPU around, but there are better options if you don't need that sort of multi-threaded capability....

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(70%)
 
  Published: 2015-01-08, Author: Stuart , review by: hardwareheaven.com

  • With the FX-8320e AMD have managed to create a very well balanced CPU. It offers performance very close to the more expensive 8370e however does so at a lower price point and with a touch less heat/power use. The CPU performs best in tasks which fully tak...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2015-01-02, Author: Ryan , review by: HEXUS.net

  • Strong multi-core performance, Excellent value for money, Easy upgrade for AM3+ owners
  • Power savings are small, Limited single-core speed
  • The addition of E-Series parts to AMD's FX eight-core line of processors may not be glamorous but, we believe, it's a positive move that AMD is giving consumers a greater range of options. AMD doesn't charge a premium for the FX-8320E and FX-8370E suggest...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-05-25, Author: Sebastian , review by: ozeros.com

  • Buscando el escenario ideal para un CPU derechamente antiguo Encontrar una razón de peso para ir por un CPU de tecnología anticuada sería como buscarle la quinta pata a un gato, considerando lo avanzado que ya se encuentra la competencia y los mismos proc...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2015-01-13, Author: Javier , review by: geeknetic.es

  • Creo que a nadie se le descubre que AMD perdió hace tiempo la capacidad de seguir el ritmo de su competidor principal pero eso no significa que no tenga productos muy interesantes y competitivos que, como iniciábamos este articulo, consiguen llegar a cier...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
    page 4 of 7 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×